Archive for July 12th, 2008

After years of development and research, Intel announced it has been awarded approval from the FDA for one of the things it makes besides processors. While it can’t pop corn, the Intel Health Guide can collect vital signs and hold video conferences between patients and physicians. The 8lb laptop sized health gadget is designed to […]


After years of development and research, Intel announced it has been awarded approval from the FDA for one of the things it makes besides processors. While it can’t pop corn, the Intel Health Guide can collect vital signs and hold video conferences between patients and physicians.

The 8lb laptop sized health gadget is designed to help patients keep up with their conditions such as medications, reminding diabetics to check their glucose or even take someone’s blood pressure. The patients information is then encrypted and securely sent to the health care professional via Intel’s online, the Intel Health Care Management Suite. When appropriate doctor and patient can discuss health issues live via video conferencing. The Health Guide runs Windows XP, has a 40GB hard drive and can also deliver inspirational messages to patients.

Although my grandmother is still puzzled by a cordless phone, Louis Burns, vice president and general manager of Intel’s Digital Health Group, is sure that this important product “will improve the state and cost of health care around the world. We envision a wide range of usage models, not only chronic conditions such as CHF and diabetes, but also programs for health and wellness management at home.”

Intel said it anticipates the its Health Guide PHS6000 to be commercially available from health care providers late this year or early 2009.

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

We’re not sure precisely how widespread the issue might be, but multiple reports on the Macrumors forums are bringing to light that some iPhone 3Gs are suffering from a screen with a yellow tint. While on a standard LCD the issue would probably just warrant a settings readjustment (like from Motion picture mode to Sports), we can’t tell whether or not this is an issue with the display itself or the firmware driving the display. Is anyone else noticing that their shiny white/black iPhone 3G is looking a bit…yellow? [Macrumors]


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

Just got an interesting tip from a reader. I wasn’t there and I don’t know what happened, but apparently one of the AT&T stores in my neck of the woods has some iPhones in stock but can’t sell them until tomorrow because of some cryptic agreement with Apple. They’re taking orders for the phones […]

Just got an interesting tip from a reader. I wasn’t there and I don’t know what happened, but apparently one of the AT&T stores in my neck of the woods has some iPhones in stock but can’t sell them until tomorrow because of some cryptic agreement with Apple. They’re taking orders for the phones this day, but won’t sell them. Weird.

“Editors,

I went to the AT&T store in Waltham, Mass at 9:45 (15 minutes before it was scheduled to open according to their site).

Comments No Comments »

Just got an interesting tip from a reader. I wasn’t there and I don’t know what happened, but apparently one of the AT&T stores in my neck of the woods has some iPhones in stock but can’t sell them until tomorrow because of some cryptic agreement with Apple. They’re taking orders for the phones […]

Just got an interesting tip from a reader. I wasn’t there and I don’t know what happened, but apparently one of the AT&T stores in my neck of the woods has some iPhones in stock but can’t sell them until tomorrow because of some cryptic agreement with Apple. They’re taking orders for the phones this day, but won’t sell them. Weird.

“Editors,

I went to the AT&T store in Waltham, Mass at 9:45 (15 minutes before it was scheduled to open according to their site). There were about 6-7 dudes in line outside and one told me that they were quote out of iPhones and only taking orders for delivery in 5-7 days. Thinking that he was just being an asshole I decided to stay in line. My decision to stay in line was confirmed to be correct as I watched a couple of customers trickle out with their new iPhones.

10 minutes later the line had grown to about 10 (including 2 women!) and then the manager came out, invited all of us in for the moment we’d all been expecting for months. The store had obviously prepared itself for the crowds as it was fully staffed and a big cooler of complimentary (non-promotional) Dasani bottled water was being emptied out and handed to me and the other excited shoppers.

Then, things took a turn for the worse! Way worse… The manager got up in front of everybody and asked who was here for an iPhone. He then went on to explain that the store was only able to take orders for iPhones that would be delivered to the store in the next 5-7 days. They would take our money and when the iPhones came in we would get a call to come in and pick them up. If they weren’t picked up in a week, they would be shipped back and the charges reversed. He also said — and this was the kicker – that he had more iPhones in stock but he couldn’t start selling them until Saturday morning due to his contract with Apple! And those would be on a first come, first served basis. In other words, Apple had manufactured a sell out of iPhones for the first day so as to generate “every store sold out of iPhones” hyproganda.

It’s one thing to actually sell out of your product. It’s another thing to manufacture a sell out of your product. In the age of YouTube, bloggers and accelerated word of mouth, companies must be punished for pulling this type of disingenuous shit.

I am pissed at Apple for taking me for granted! I loved my iPhone and was willing to shell out several hundred dollars for a 3G on Day 1. I feel used. Like a chump who was turned away so Apple could get a nice sound byte on the news and the Blogs. I am so angry that I’m planning to vote with my wallet… I’m going to wait and purchase the BlackBerry Bold which is coming out next month. So long as BlackBerry doesn’t pull the same shit.

Best wishes,

Mark J. Feldman”

Thanks for sending this in, Mark. Keep us posted.

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

There are easy reasons why the new iPhone 3G is superior than the last.

Apple has eliminated so many annoying tiny hang-ups that you might run into when using the old one. The GPS pinpoints to meters instead of blocks. The 3G connection slashes web loading times by minutes to seconds. The more rounded case feels great in the hand. And most importantly the new software polishes the OS and opens the phone up to almost unlimited abilities through the countless programs that are already being written by the brilliant legions of faithful developers. It’s kind of cool.

If you want to cut to the chase, the software is what we’re most excited about — so much that we ran the first half of this review earlier extolling the iPhone 2.0 virtues in detail, including the fact that it’s a free upgrade for the people who snapped up the first iPhone, perhaps before it was ready.

On the software side, the iPhone has the most advanced touchscreen OS out there today. Scrolling, dialing, panning, zooming, touching and pinching are all actions you can do to get around your photos, your maps, your movies, your music and of course, your phone calls. The iPhone 2.0 update improves on the already great communication features such as desktop-class email and web browsing by adding MobileMe and Exchange support—both of which push emails to your phone as soon as they’re received, just like on the BlackBerry. These two new additions also grant your phone to always sync contacts and calendar events with your computer or your office’s system directly over the air, without ever needing to dock, or take any action. There’s also the App Store, which gives you access to a gigantic library of third-party applications to add features such as controlling your iTunes, instant messaging, 3D gaming and To Do lists.

The fact that the free software’s advantages are available on the original iPhone means that the reduced subsidized price $199 for the 8GB and $299 for the 16GB are good, but maybe not good enough to justify a trade-in. (The $10 extra a month for 3G access is a wash, frankly.) Quite a conundrum for those of you tempted.

Onto the hardware. Let’s start with the husk: Once, I sat down on a twisted key, putting a giant scar across the aluminum back of my iPhone. With that one exception aside, my iPhone’s abused-to-hell case still looks strong and shiny.

The new case is made of smudge-able plastic, and last time I checked geek material lust hierarchy, plastic was a distant ranking of 452342 places behind aluminum. The effect is that the case feels lighter, warmer and thicker but also cheaper than before. And in your hand, picking up a slightly warm iPhone, it feels almost more organic. Between that and the the rounded shape, which fits far superior in the hand, it’s like you’re cupping a warm baby bird. The old phone by comparison feels like it’s a better quality device, with the spiritual heft of a German machine. The new case is lighter but actually thicker; still, it feels less significant and durable. The case is also a lot easier to send radio waves through than the previous case—useful as this phone has many more radios. Also, if you place the new model on a table, it rocks when you tap the screen, so you can’t use it as a tabletop computer anymore.

The screen is slightly warmer in color temperature (more yellow than blue), slightly brighter (even when considering decay over time) and the daylight viewing is better, but it’s the same 3.5-inch, 480320 resolution screen. And it’s still gorgeous.

Oh, the headphone jack isn’t recessed anymore, so you can use whatever headphones or adapters you want. And the lock and volume buttons are recessed slightly more and are metal. To great effect.

To mention the 3G is to bring up painful memories, the time I’ve lost waiting for web pages to load on the iPhone, or standing on street corners waiting for maps to load.

Our tests in AT&T’s aggressively built-out NYC area showed the 3G connection is 4.8 times faster than the old EDGE connection. When you turn off 3G and do an EDGE-to-EDGE test between older and newer models, they both perform the same. The GPRS (850, 900, 1800, 1900) and UMTS/HSDPA (850, 1900 and 2100 MHz) cellular radios have the advantage of some design improvements, including the use of the steel ring around the screen as an antenna and the electronic transparency of the now all-plastic back.

Wi-Fi reception is better. In a side-by-side test with the old iPhone, when we walked away from an access point, the old iPhone’s connection died at 100 feet and the newer one lasted to about 120 feet. And there’s a new Airplane mode that turns off cellular but powers up Wi-Fi for airline internet.

At the end of a day with lots of email and browser use, or media playback, my old iPhone would be begging for a serious dock charge. How does the iPhone’s 3G connection affect that?


The downside of such speedy downloads is a reduced battery life, something the original couldn’t stand to lose much of. We’ll do more testing of that soon. But here’s an interesting thing: According to the data out there, the iPhone 3G has better battery life using 3G than the old iPhone does using EDGE. Let me explain. Apple’s official browsing battery life rating on Wi-Fi is 6 hours for both models. They never rated the EDGE battery life but most testers found it to be about 25% less than Wi-Fi. That’s 4.5 hours. The iPhone 3G rating is 5 hours of browsing. Apple is claiming that it’s 5 hours for both the new iPhone 3G and the EDGE on the old one. We shall investigate such claims soon. But I wish Apple would take me up on my idea for using the 3G only for active browsing, maps and certain apps that need it, dynamically switching to EDGE for IMing, email downloading and weather checking.

Phone-wise, I decided to lower my minute plan. I absolutely have stopped using my old iPhone for voice in San Francisco’s spotty network, and even when I’m connected, everyone sounds like they’ve marbles in their mouth. Network problems aside, the good news is that basic voice quality issues have been fixed.

Doing side-by-side calls, the difference when using the new phone and old is like the difference between talking to someone with their hand over their mouth and with their hand taken away. While the new iPhone’s speaker and mic definitely improve sound quality, it seems packets do matter too. When the the phone is running on a 3G network (in downtown NY), calls sound especially clear compared with the old iPhone. But when both iPhones are on EDGE, the call difference is noticeable, but not night and day. Even the speakerphone’s audio is much louder and so, music played through the mono speaker is also improved. As for reception back in spotty coverage areas, I’ll have to do a side-by-side soon to let you know how that goes.

The old iPhone’s location detector was accurate within a few blocks, using Skyhook’s system of logging cellular towers and Wi-Fi spot MAC addresses and pairing them with physical addreses. I thought it was fine for making sure when I searched for an ATM machine, it would only return local results. The new A-GPS system is accurate within meters, though, opening up the iPhone to more useful location-based apps, maps and geotagging of pics.

The A-GPS helps get quicker fixes in the city, compared with a typical PND. However it doesn’t refresh as swiftly (every 5 to 15 steps), and won’t give you a “heading-up” view, so when you’re walking, it takes a bit longer to figure out where you’re going. This is clearly optimized for walking, though in a pinch it could help lost drivers. The greater accuracy isn’t the only reason it’s better than the older iPhone: The capability to track your path is a nice enhancement too. The time to GPS lock is between 1 and 10 seconds, using a combination of Wi-Fi and cellular as well as GPS.

Apple didn’t write a dedicated turn-by-turn navigator for driving, with voice, but now we hear that companies are making them, so we look forward to revisiting this once real navi apps are out.

The old iPhone’s software can take a photo and email it or send it to a MobileMe gallery, but the camera itself is relatively weak. It won’t capture video, and I’ve lost countless YouTube hits by not having a video device at the ready. This situation has not been improved much.

The new camera has the same 2MP shooter which returns 1600 x 1200 pixels. There still isn’t video capture. Image processing seems to be slightly less grainy but it’s not something you would notice. The MP count would be fine, but the low-light quality is still terrible. Nokia and Motorola have built thin phones with superior imaging, why not Apple? And Apple’s forte is software, so why can’t they beef up the software tools, by adding image stabilizers and noise reducers, not to mention Photo Booth-type frames and effects?

This is really not a revolutionary phone. It’s more like the iPhone we wished Apple made last year. But basics, like cut, copy and paste are still missing. (As is MMS, thanks for the reminder, commenters.) As well as the capability to use the phone like a hard drive. Other than that, we’re hoping for some more revolutionary changes to come by software update. And let’s take a moment to remember how many developers are making killer iPhone programs right this second. There’s the revolution.

So the hardware is interesting in the iPhone 3G, but the real story here is the new iPhone OS 2.0 firmware, which we’ve written about in depth here. You manage to install that, iPhone users, you’ve got about 80% of this new iPhone’s new mojo. But if you’re not making your calls on an iPhone yet, well, what are you waiting for?
[Our iPhone App Review Marathon, iPhone 2.0 Firmware Review: Forget 3G It’s the Code That Counts]


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

I play Rock Band like a champ, and when I’m with my crew I’m usually on drums. I’m a drummer, and I love playing them, and the included drum controller always seemed just fine to me. Then I saw this new premium drum kit, and I decided I must have it.


Instead of just four heads, the badass looking kit gives you four heads, hi hat, crash, and ride cymbals. This kit, which will come with Rock Band 2 certainly beats the Guitar Hero: World Tour offering, but it also signals something unusual: the begin of a music games arms war. I hope they bring it hard. [Kotaku]


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

Remember: Every week we’ll be giving away a cool Samsung phone culminating in the Samsung Instinct! We begin our contest this week gunning for the M520. The haiku should focus on hearing and must be tweeted to UseYourInstinct. We’ll close entries for this week at noon on Tuesday, July 15. What’s a haiku? Here’s […]

Remember: Every week we’ll be giving away a cool Samsung phone culminating in the Samsung Instinct!

We begin our contest this week gunning for the M520. The haiku should focus on hearing and must be tweeted to UseYourInstinct. We will close entries for this week at noon on Tuesday, July 15.

What is a haiku? Here’s an example. It’s a short poem of three lines consiting of 5 syllables, 7 syllables, and 5 syllables.
For example:

The M520
doesn’t ring. It reminds me
that I’m a big nerd.

Read on for the rules.

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

While Nike is releasing some half-baked Back to the Future “inspired” shoes, purists know that they aren’t the real deal. Sort of looking like the shoes from the motion picture isn’t enough. They need to be the shoes from the movie. Well, here you go: the original prototype shoe built for the movie. It doesn’t get much more authentic than this, and it’s actually available now on eBay. Oh baby.

Unfortunately, it’s just one shoe, not the full pair, making wearing them down the street impossible. However, this one shoes was worn by Michael J. Fox and was used to build the final pair that he wore in the motion picture. Check it:

This is IT. The one and only original prototype of the Nike shoes Michael J. Fox wore in the motion picture Back To the Future II. You are bidding on a single shoe, not a pair. The shoe was designed as a working model, not a practical shoe, although it can be worn. It was worn once to the premiere of the motion picture in Beaverton, Oregon, and again by Michael J. Fox in Hollywood at a test fitting.

Back in 1989 I worked in the Nike Sport Research Lab as the Electronics Technician. The original BTF2 shoes for the motion picture were built by hand in the Nike Sample Room, and I was the one who designed and installed the electronics for them.

The lights in the side of the midsole and the Nike logo on the ankle strap are electro-luminescent panels, and there is an array of six randomly flashing LEDs on the side of the heel that were never visible in the motion picture

They were originally called “Slamball Shoes,” and that’s what most people called them around Nike. There was supposed to have been a scene in the motion picture in which Marty plays Slamball, a game like 3D racquetball where the participants wear magnetic shoes which grant them to climb up the walls. That scene was never shot because the cost of building a large room on gimbals to create the effect was too great.

The REAL name of the shoes in Marty McFly’s world of 2015 was the “Nike Mag” because of their magnetic properties, and that’s what is molded in the back of the heel.
The shoe is in “good” condition for what it is, but since the polyurethane midsole and fabric body of the shoe were simply spray-painted in the recommended color, some of the paint has flaked off over time. The LEDs, the E-L panel on the ankle strap, and one of the two E-L panels on the midsole still work. The other midsole panel comes on if you flex the shoe slightly. I originally thought I could get away with a rigid connection between those two panels, but it turned out that the flexing of the shoe during wear broke the connection. It might be fixable with some delicate surgery, but I never had the guts to try it.

The included power/electronics pack is hard-wired to the shoe, and requires two 9 volt batteries to operate.

I believe the shoe was built as a men’s size 9, although I couldn’t swear to it. It is whatever size Fox was at the time.

The shoe comes with a color photocopy of the original design drawing by Nike’s Tinker Hatfield (the designer of all of the Air Jordans, among many other things).

Bidding starts at a cool $1,000, and the auction ends in 9 days. Get them credit cards ready. [eBay; Thanks, Michael!


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

Today’s Top Posts: An apology… and a dark gift Apple and AT&T in cahoots over fake iPhone shortage? Daily Crunch: Smoke and Mirrors Edition Paint it black Six million iBricks… and growing CrunchGear’s John Biggs live from the iPhone line Not iPhone: Seagate introduces new 1.5TB desktop drive, two 500GB notebook drives Not iPhone: New super-mobile robot for use in war, disaster and […]

cg

Today’s Top Posts:

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It